
Málnotkun sem mælikvarði á áhrif málstöðlunar: Skólaritgerðir úr Lærða skólanum í Reykjavík (1846–1904)
Author(s) -
Heimir van der Veest Viðarsson
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
orð og tunga
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2547-7218
pISSN - 1022-4610
DOI - 10.33112/ordogtunga.19.5
Subject(s) - verb , graduation (instrument) , pronoun , grammar , linguistics , selection (genetic algorithm) , test (biology) , psychology , mathematics , statistics , computer science , philosophy , artificial intelligence , geology , paleontology , geometry
The Reykjavík Grammar School (1846–1904) has been widely regarded as a primary force in the implementation of standard language norms in Iceland. The present article attempts to test this hypothesis in a selection of 189 student essays from the grammar school, including a survey of the teachers’ corrections. Three linguistic variables were selected, both known from the prescriptivist tradition and corrected in the es-says: 1) the generic pronoun maður, 2) the finite verb in third (V3) rather than second position (V2), 3) the definite article sá vs. hinn. Based on a series of statistical tools, a log-likelihood test for the generic pronoun, generalised linear mixed-effects models and conditional random forests for verb placement and the definite article, it is argued that the use of non-standard variants correlates significantly with progression of study (grades 1–3 vs. 4–6) and/or graduation score (low vs. high). The small corpus size prevented an analysis along the lines of Hinrichs et al. (2015), who recommend testing whether the (non-)use of one stigmatised ariant also correlates with the (non-)use of other stigmatised variants. Here, the educative variables arguably fulfil a similar function, independently from observing frequency decrease over time. The results thus suggest that prescriptive efforts were, indeed, quite successful.