Open AccessStudy of Topology Optimized Hammerhead Pier Beam Made with Novel Preplaced Aggregate Fibrous Concrete
Author(s) -
K. Karthikeyan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
periodica polytechnica. civil engineering/periodica polytechnica. civil engineering (online)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.406
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 1587-3773
pISSN - 0553-6626
DOI - 10.3311/ppci.16905
Subject(s) - formwork , beam (structure) , structural engineering , pier , materials science , aggregate (composite) , durability , topology optimization , stress (linguistics) , cross section (physics) , grout , composite material , fiber , topology (electrical circuits) , engineering , finite element method , linguistics , philosophy , physics , electrical engineering , quantum mechanics
This study aims to study topology Optimized Hammerhead Pier Beam (TOHPB) designed with a density-based technique. TOHPB is made with Preplaced Aggregate Fibrous Concrete (PAFC), which comprises two main preparation processes. First, the fibers and coarse aggregates filled into empty formwork to develop a skeletal system. Second, voids in the skeletal system are filled with cement grout; hence a type of PAFC was obtained. Besides, alleviating the self-weight of the concrete beam is a top priority of design engineering without compromising its strength and durability. The effect of topology optimization in association with the safety of factors and elastic design case is considered in this study. Explicitly, (i) compliance is scaled down to a minimum under a perimeter on the utilized material (ii) the principle Drucker-Prager is employed to impose the stress limitations even though utilization of material is minimized. The problem is designed with imposed stress limitation and generates keys that involve an essential part of post-processing before fabrication. In total, ten TOHPB were prepared with and without the combined shape of crimped-hooked end steel fiber. Two different types of fiber reinforcement schemes were used; first, the fibers were reinforced to full beam cross-section; then, the fibers were reinforced to the top half of the beam cross-section. Results revealed that the TOHPB beam reinforced full cross-section exhibited better ultimate load performance than that of the beam with half reinforced cross-section.