Open AccessForms of counteraction to the youth subcultural movement in the USSR in the 1940s-1960: historical and legal aspect
Author(s) -
Lidiia Fedyk
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
naukovo-ìnformacìjnij vìsnik ìvano-frankìvsʹkogo unìversitetu prava ìmenì korolâ danila galitsʹkogo/naukovo-ìnformacìjnij vìsnik ìvano-frankìvsʹkogo unìversitetu prava ìmenì korolâ danila galicʹkogo
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2618-0308
pISSN - 2078-6670
DOI - 10.33098/2078-6670.10.22.99-109
Subject(s) - ideology , subculture (biology) , humiliation , sociology , law enforcement , law , political science , criminology , scholarship , institution , politics , botany , biology
Goal. The aim of the study is to analyze the main forms and methods of counteraction of the state and society in the USSR to the youth subcultural movement in 1940-1960. The method covers a set of methods and logical sequence of their use, which was determined by issues and features of historical and legal research. Methods. The use of general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis and abstraction allowed to empirically study the youth subculture in 1940 - 1960's. Historical and legal method allowed to consider the youth subculture as a phenomenon of a particular era, taking into account the influence of economic, social and ideological factors. The comparative law method in our study was useful for comparing the measures applied to the youth subculture by party, youth organizations, law enforcement agencies and educational institutions. Results. The study found that the youth subcultural movement in the USSR was heterogeneous. It was found that, despite the apolitical nature of the movement, within the Cold War and confrontation with the West, it was seen as a threat to the existing social order and contrary to official ideology. This created the preconditions for combating it, which were carried out with the involvement of the party and Komsomol apparatuses. Scientific novelty. It was established that the main forms of struggle against the youth subcultural movement were extrajudicial, which provided for moral pressure, expulsion from the Komsomol, an educational institution, deprivation of a scholarship, and public humiliation. Practical significance. It is that the main provisions and conclusions set out in the study can be used: 1) in research related to the study of the features and legal principles of the repressive policy of the Soviet government; 2) in the educational process, during the teaching of sections relating to the state and legal development of Central and Eastern Europe.