z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Penerapan Peradilan Adat Berbasis Kuasi Yudisial Dalam Memutus Sengketa Adat
Author(s) -
Al Araf Assadallah Marzuki
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
legalitas/legalitas : jurnal hukum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2597-8861
pISSN - 2085-0212
DOI - 10.33087/legalitas.v12i2.225
Subject(s) - law , political science , economic justice , dispute resolution , position (finance) , normative , court decision , verdict , business , finance
The customary court is not a judicial institution that can decide a dispute with the direction of justice as in the national court so that recognition of customary decisions does not get permanent legal force which results in legal uncertainty in dispute resolution through customary court institutions. Thus, there is an idea that is offered in this research that implements customary courts as quasi-judicial in resolving customary disputes. Through normative juridical research, it is found that: first, the position of customary courts is only limited to deliberative dispute resolution, and in the judicial hierarchy its position is not recognized. Second, the quasi-judicial model that can be applied in customary courts can emulate KPPU in deciding disputes where to obtain permanent legal force, the KPPU's decision needs to be ruled by a district court, and if some object to the verdict, they can file an objection legal remedy in the domestic court. a period of 14 days from receipt of the decision on the parties.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here