z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Epistemologi Falsifikasionisme Karl R. Popper: Relevansinya Bagi Teologi dan Pemikiran Keislaman
Author(s) -
Asep Saepullah
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of islamic civilization
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2657-1013
pISSN - 2657-1021
DOI - 10.33086/jic.v2i2.1737
Subject(s) - critical rationalism , positivism , empiricism , karl popper , epistemology , criticism , rationalism , logical positivism , philosophy , philosophy of science , relevance (law) , political science , law
One of the functions of the human mind is think rationally and scientifically. This creates an idea of ​​a theory of knowledge (epistemology) which is part of the philosophy of science with various schools and figures, namely rationalism, empiricism, positivism, and criticism. However, the existing schools received special attention because there were still many shortcomings in it, one of which was August Comte's positivism which was criticized by Karl R. Popper. Not stopping at criticism, Popper also offers new principles as solutions to the problems that criticizing. Through the three stages of the world, namely the physical world, the human world and its psychological processes and the world of science. According to Popper, the truth of a science is not determined through justification (verification), but through refuting the propositions established by science itself (falsification). Therefore, the author tries to explain how the relevance of Karl R. Popper's epistemology with theology and Islamic thought through a historical-philosophical approach. Through this approach, the authors conclude that all science has the possibility to be falsified, including theology and Islamic thought

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here