z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Avoiding the Swine
Author(s) -
Jee Won Choi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
stance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1943-1899
pISSN - 1943-1880
DOI - 10.33043/s.14.1.115-123
Subject(s) - hedonism , pleasure , pain and pleasure , philosophy , epistemology , simple (philosophy) , environmental ethics , psychology , psychotherapist
What constitutes a good life? A hedonist’s answer to this question is rather simple— more pleasure, less pain. While hedonism was previously a widely accepted belief, it now suffers from several crucial objections. A challenge particularly vexing to hedonists is the Philosophy of Swine: could it be possible that our lives may be less than that of a theoretical swine? In this essay, I argue that lifetime hedonism, the view of hedonism concerned with one’s total lifelong well-being, does not survive this objection. In particular, I will refute the counterarguments that modern-day hedonist, Ben Bramble, presents against the Philosophy of Swine objection.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here