Open AccessBreak the Limits: INGOs Limitation and Learning from Amnesty International
Author(s) -
Vinesha Anindita
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
wimaya
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2722-3760
DOI - 10.33005/wimaya.v1i01.12
Subject(s) - amnesty , grassroots , political science , accountability , government (linguistics) , independence (probability theory) , contradiction , civil society , public administration , law , human rights , politics , linguistics , philosophy , statistics , mathematics , epistemology
Civil society as the beginning of the notions of INGOs gives a holistic view to analyze the problem and the limit of International non-governmental organizations (INGOs) itself. Critics that arises regarding the limit of INGOs is the lack of independence of INGOs that is questionable about the possibility of the dependence of funds even from individual actor to government fund. It can reduce the roles and the functions of INGOs to act objectively. Another critic for INGOs is a complex matter for international organizations in general about the lack of accountability. So many questions about how do INGOs can be more accountable or whom INGOs should be accountable. This paper argues that accountability should not just for the donors or the government but also stakeholder/grassroots. But, the limit of INGOs can be answered by Amnesty International which is a contradiction example of international organizations that is not affected by the limit of INGO.