Open AccessAuthentic Followership: Criticism of the Authentic Followership Models
Author(s) -
Triyo Utomo,
Seger Handoyo,
Fajrianthi Fajrianthi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
psychosophia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2721-2564
DOI - 10.32923/psc.v3i2.1843
Subject(s) - followership , strengths and weaknesses , criticism , epistemology , psychology , management science , sociology , engineering ethics , social psychology , political science , philosophy , engineering , law
Scholars have begun to shift their focus from leadership to followership. The results of several studies indicate that followership has several positive impacts. One type of followership that exists is authentic followership. Several scholars have created several authentic followership models that have been published in journals. In this paper, we will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of existing authentic followership models. The method used in this paper is by conducting a scoping review to answer the research objectives. Scoping review is a method for synthesizing and categorizing research results based on the literature review that has been carried out. Furthermore, the analysis used in this scoping review is thematic analysis. As a result, each authentic followership model has its own strengths and weaknesses. In addition, based on the perspective of the underlying theory, the three existing authentic followership models can be divided into two perspectives. The two perspectives are state and trait perspectives. This paper will also discuss the criticism of the state and trait perspectives. The practical implication of this paper is that there is a need to develop an authentic followership model based on the results of existing research.