
INTERACTION OF THE NATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU OF UKRAINE WITH INDIVIDUAL ENTITIES OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE
Author(s) -
О. І. Сорський
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
ûridična nauka
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2222-5374
DOI - 10.32844/2222-5374-2020-105-3.35
Subject(s) - language change , agency (philosophy) , law enforcement , enforcement , corporate governance , state (computer science) , audit , political science , business , public administration , relevance (law) , law , accounting , sociology , finance , art , social science , literature , algorithm , computer science
The relevance of the article is that the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine is the only law enforcement agency with a special status that performs the functions of combating and stopping corruption offenses. But, it is obvious that the forces of this state law enforcement body alone cannot qualitatively fight such a negative social phenomenon as corruption in public authorities. It is worth noting that real success in the fight against corruption can be achieved only through constant and fruitful interaction of this body with other public authorities. Moreover, such cooperation is facilitated by a fairly good construction of state bodies that perform various functions and tasks, including the detection and prevention of corruption, and they can really help the National Bureau of Ukraine in the fight against corruption. The article considers some aspects of the interaction of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine with the State Financial Monitoring Service of Ukraine, the State Audit Office of Ukraine, the National Agency for Prevention of Corruption, law enforcement agencies to detect and combat corruption and crimes, exposing perpetrators of corruption offenses. It was found that the interaction of the National Bureau with the National Agency for Prevention of Corruption has its own specific features and is characterized by the following factors: 1) the method of information exchange (electronic), 2) has a special level of information protection, 3) measures control by the parties to the interaction. A general characteristic of such interaction is that its procedure is clearly defined by laws and regulations of Ukraine and it is carried out in order to perform the tasks and functions assigned to the National Bureau. It is concluded that the interaction is both procedural and managerial in nature. Emphasis is placed on the outdated legal regulation of cooperation between the National Bureau and the State Audit Office of Ukraine and the lack of a legislative procedure for involving the National Bureau as a specialist representative of the State Audit Office of Ukraine.