Open AccessDEVELOPMENT OF THE THEORY OF ECONOMIC SECURITY OF THE STATE IN UKRAINE: SPECIFICS OF INSTITUTIONALISATION AND METHODOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES
Author(s) -
Aleksy Moldowan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pričornomorsʹkì ekonomìčnì studìï
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2524-0900
pISSN - 2524-0897
DOI - 10.32843/bses.66-1
Subject(s) - ukrainian , institutionalisation , pace , state (computer science) , sociology of scientific knowledge , order (exchange) , political science , historicism , value (mathematics) , economic system , epistemology , positive economics , sociology , social science , law , geography , mathematics , business , economics , philosophy , linguistics , geodesy , finance , algorithm , statistics
The article focuses on specifics of the development of the theory of economic security of the state in Ukraine. Firstly, the ecosestate as a discipline in Ukraine is characterized by a high level of fragmentation and disintegration. Indeed, a lot of scientific schools have emerged and are actively developing in the country, each of which has a well-developed methodological base of research and its own system of scientific principles and values. On the one hand, this is its significant advantage, because the scientific knowledge has been upgraded all the time that increases their practical value. On the other hand, existing a lot of absolutely different concepts results in methodological chaos in this discipline. The author presented his own approach to the systematization a large number of Ukrainian scientists’ concepts in order to sort various scientific schools out. This approach is based on the principle of historicism, according to which each concept is valid in the relevant historical period of Ukraine, which is characterized by particular conditions and circumstances. Three periods were identified and every period has been studied scrupulously to find out main factors that cause very specific trends in economic security of the state in Ukraine. Secondly, ecosestate is characterized by a high pace of evolution in Ukraine. The author explains, that is a very important sign of its validity. Ukrainian scientific community of ecosestate has to deal with rapid dynamic of transformation of Ukrainian state, as well as conditions in which it operates. It naturally requires constant verification of scientific knowledge in terms of their compliance with new realities. Thirdly, unlike most countries, where ecosestate is actively developing, Ukraine has its own specific context – a hybrid conflict with another subject of international relations, which continues to be aggressive towards the state. This naturally transforms not only Ukrainian reality, but also Ukrainian scientific community. Based on the considerations outlined in the article the author states, that domestic scientific community has a unique experience, so the methodological achievements of Ukrainian experts in certain aspects more advanced than ones of scientific schools in other countries.