Open AccessAcceptor Comment of PostPlacental Copper T380A Intrauterine Device
Author(s) -
Eka Rusdianto Gunardi,
Adila Ra Malik,
Febby Oktavianti,
Riry Meria,
Fachreza Ardianto,
Christina Marian
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
indonesian journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2338-7335
pISSN - 2338-6401
DOI - 10.32771/inajog.v5i1.460
Subject(s) - medicine , intrauterine device , obstetrics , abdominal pain , gynecology , lower abdominal pain , complication , family planning , population , research methodology , surgery , environmental health
Objective: To describe the characteristics of subjective complaints
reported by post-placental inserted intrauterine device (IUD)
acceptor, especially those who used Copper T380A (CU T380A) type
of IUD.
Methods: Seventy-two-married women whose age ranged from 19
to 44 years old and received post-placental IUD in Dr. Cipto
Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, were included in this study.
Subjective complaints regarding the use of CU T380A IUD were
evaluated twice including during the puerperium and six months
afterwards by a direct interview.
Results: Most respondents were 20-35 years old, 50% of whom
were primiparous (n=36). There were 42% respondents reporting
pain during insertion, 32% respondents reporting abdominal pain
during the use, 22% respondents reporting menstrual disorder,
18% respondents reporting vaginal discharge, and 3% respondents
complaining of having IUD repulsion.
Conclusion: There are variety of subjective complaints reported
after post-placental IUD use. However, most of the respondents does
not complain anything.
[Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-1: 19-22]
Keywords: complication, contraception, intrauterine device (IUD)
post-placental, postpartum