Open AccessAntonomasia In Hate Speech
Author(s) -
Elza Leyli Lisnora Saragih,
Tiarma Intan Marpaung
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
talenta conference series. local wisdom, social, and arts
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2654-7066
pISSN - 2654-7058
DOI - 10.32734/lwsa.v4i2.1202
Subject(s) - meaning (existential) , metonymy , documentation , linguistics , social media , politics , psychology , media studies , sociology , computer science , political science , metaphor , world wide web , law , philosophy , psychotherapist , programming language
This study deals with the usage, kinds and meaning of antonomasia in hate speech of netizen to political figures in social media. And the purpose of the study is to describe the using, kinds and meaning of antonomasia in the hate speech. The data is taken from written comments of netizen in some social media such as instagram, twitter, facebook, line, whatsApp and youtube in period of time year 2018 to 2019.This study uses descriptive design. The method of collecting data is documentation then analyzed by using descriptive qualitative design. The types of antonomasia found in the study are metonymic and metaphoric antonomasia. The usage of antonomasia comes from things, historical, animals and another literature. The forms of antonomasia are adjectival, substantial, and relative antonomasia. The netizen uses antonomasia to give a concrete opinion towards abstract things to emphasize someone’s signature in a negative meaning.