
Creating Meaningful Grades
Author(s) -
Joshua Kunnath Kunnath
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of school administration research and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2470-850X
pISSN - 2470-8496
DOI - 10.32674/jsard.v2i1.1926
Subject(s) - grading (engineering) , matriculation , psychology , mathematics education , affect (linguistics) , engineering , civil engineering , communication
Grades matter and the future lives of students are in many ways dependent on teacher grading practices. After all, so many decisions that affect students’ lives, including student ranking, matriculation, retention, college admission, and scholarships, depend on grades (Guskey, 2015; Marzano, 2000). This is troubling because the grading practices used in high schools across the country are generally considered to be highly variable and invalid measures of learning, often consisting of a hodgepodge of factors including achievement, behavior, and effort (Brimi, 2011; Brookhart, 1991; Randall & Engelhard, 2009, 2010). In other words, the data that many parties use to make important decisions regarding the lives of students is invalid. In fact, Marzano (2000), a leading grading researcher, declared, “Grades are so imprecise that they are almost meaningless” (p. 1). While most parties assume that grades represent student learning (Brookhart, 2004), this is rarely the case. As a result, the misinterpretation of grade data often leads to poor decisions regarding students. To add insult to injury, over 100 years of research has documented these problems (Brookhart et al., 2016), but educators’ seem- ing indifference to the research has resulted in no significant changes (Dueck, 2014; Reeves, 2011).