z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
(Un)Disciplining Interdisciplinarity
Author(s) -
Jeremy Dennis
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of interdisciplinary studies in education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2690-0408
pISSN - 2166-2681
DOI - 10.32674/jise.v8i1.600
Subject(s) - clarity , metaphor , epistemology , field (mathematics) , root (linguistics) , strict constructionism , sociology , interdisciplinarity , bridge (graph theory) , social science , philosophy , linguistics , mathematics , medicine , biochemistry , chemistry , pure mathematics
In interdisciplinary education, metaphors often provide the epistemological clarity that is lacking in our definitions and theories of interdisciplinarity. The problem is that ineffective and unsubstantiated metaphors proliferate. We lack a root metaphor or shared world view of interdisciplinarity. Is it time that we move away from thinking in terms of metaphors? Some instrumentalists in interdisciplinary studies argue yes and propose a pragmatic constructionist approach for interdisciplinary education. This theoretical study determines that this proposal is incomplete. It reveals that an intertextual view of interdisciplinarity is not only more appropriate, but it integrates the competing theoretical and pedagogical approaches in the field. This article also identifies “the matrix” as the metaphor best positioned to sustain this integration and to bridge the widening gap between disciplines.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here