СОЦІАЛЬНО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА ДОЦІЛЬНІСТЬ УПРАВЛІННЯ ФІНАНСОВО-ВИРОБНИЧИМИ СИСТЕМАМИ

The author's opinion on developing criteria of expediency of management of financial and economic processes in the country is given in the article. There are parallels between the usefulness and benefits of managing financial and production systems. The purpose of the article is to justify the socioeconomic feasibility of managing financial and production systems through the use of the socially useful factor of the production system and the display of utility as a principle of priority at the level of formal statement of the fact of the availability of the effectiveness or possible size of the economic loss. The object of the study is financial-production systems in terms of their ability to form social utility. Methods used in the research are a systematic approach, a method of generalization, comparison, logical-content method, monographic method, methods of induction and deduction. The hypothesis of research the profitability of a functioning company depends on the variant of economic policy, which is formed at the expense of the economic structure and social utility of its sphere of production, that is, its economic efficiency. The statement of basic materials. Social utility is justified as a key indicator to be guided by in making managerial decisions in the field of economics and finance. Homeostasis does not perform the function of optimizing the production system, but only balances the ratio of reduction and compensation of value in this system. As a result, the continuity of production is achieved, that is, the conditions are always satisfied at the presence of positive value in each production element at a certain level of non-productive consumption of labor costs. Originality and practical significance of the research is to develop a scheme for managing the production system, taking into account social utility, as well as mathematical interpretation of the systemic and homeostasis of the production system. Conclusions of research are reasonable, economic indicators of the production system can be used only for the operational evaluation of performance, but cannot be the basis for predicting the social performance of the financial and production system.