z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Return to Work of Lymphoma Survivors after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
iranian red crescent medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2074-1812
pISSN - 2074-1804
DOI - 10.32592/ircmj.2021.23.7.644
Subject(s) - medicine , autologous stem cell transplantation , refractory (planetary science) , transplantation , lymphoma , surgery , single center , cross sectional study , physics , astrobiology , pathology
Background: The effectiveness of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma is accepted by all authors. After ASCT, 5-year overall-survival (OS) rates can reach up to 80%. However, returning to work-life after ASCT and the employment status of these patients are unknown.Objectives: Our aim in this study is to examine the rate of not-return to work in the post-treatment period and the factors that may affect employment status in patients who underwent ASCT with the diagnosis of relapsed/refractory lymphoma.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2020 - June 2020. Patients between the ages of 18-65, who underwent ASCT with the diagnosis of relapsed or refractory lymphoma and who were in remission without recurrence one-year after ASCT were included in the study.Results: Eighty (74.8%) of 107 patients included in the study were male, and the median age was 49.0 (21-63). The number of primary school graduates was 66 (61.7%). Most of the patients were married (n = 90, 84.1%). Before ASCT, 30 (28.0%) patients were in the private sector, 17 (15.9%) were in their own workplace. Median follow-up time was 34.8 months (12.4 - 124.7 months). During this follow-up period 35 (57.3%) of 61 patients did not return to work. Most of these patients had retired (n=29, 47.5%). It was seen that having a higher education level (OR: 0.32 (0.14-1.22) 95% CI, p:0.041) and public employee (OR: 0.30 (0.12-0.97) 95% CI, p:0.033) are independent factors that reduce the risk of not-returning to work.Conclusion: It was observed that more than half of our patients did not return to work. Low level of education and sectors other than public-employee pose a risk for not returning to work. It may be possible for patients to return to work with well-planned options such as part-time.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom