Open AccessChanges to the concept of sovereignty in post-1989 Hungary
Author(s) -
Balázs András Orbán
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pro publico bono - magyar közigazgatás/pro publico bono – magyar közigazgatás
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2786-0760
pISSN - 2063-9058
DOI - 10.32575/ppb.2021.4.2
Subject(s) - sovereignty , diversification (marketing strategy) , political science , element (criminal law) , subject (documents) , law , international law , public discourse , order (exchange) , sociology , social science , law and economics , economics , politics , finance , marketing , library science , computer science , business
The concept of sovereignty is a discourse element encompassing many disciplines, and is also a subject of public debate. In order to better understand the processes of Hungarian public life, the present study examines the changes in the content of discourse concerning the concept of sovereignty in Hungary between 1990 and 2021. It focuses on two fields of law, namely international law (and the theory of international relations) and constitutional law. While in the 1990s and 2000s professional and public dialogue were characterised by a discourse which followed Western patterns in seeking to transcend traditional notions of sovereignty, the early 2020s have so far been characterised by a return to the classical concept, and a diversification of positions can likewise be observed in the academic discourse on sovereignty in Hungary.