z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Symbolic diplomacy of place and space in Eurasia: “multi-vector” vs. “third neighbor” policies-impact of nomadic features on foreign policy strategies of Kazakhstan and Mongolia
Author(s) -
Alicia Campi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
turkic studies journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2708-7360
pISSN - 2664-5157
DOI - 10.32523/2664-5157-2020-2-3-53
Subject(s) - landlocked country , superpower , china , geography , diplomacy , political science , foreign policy , soviet union , democracy , economy , development economics , economic geography , politics , law , economics , archaeology
This paper examines the present-day diplomatic policies of Kazakhstan and Mongolia, which are two landlocked Eurasian nations that share a common no madic and Soviet heritage. Both utilize symbolism of place and space as intersections between transcontinental subgroupings to promote economic development within a continent dominated by superpower neighbors, China and Russia. The two nations in the democratic era after the collapse of the Soviet Union have devised “Multi-Vector” and “Third Neighbor” strategies derived from their historic nomadic experiences to break out of their landlocked geographical constraints.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here