z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Wh-questions in Kitharaka
Author(s) -
Peter Kinyua Muriungi
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
studies in african linguistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.178
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 2154-428X
pISSN - 0039-3533
DOI - 10.32473/sal.v34i1.107332
Subject(s) - focus (optics) , linguistics , feature (linguistics) , syntax , bantu languages , phrase , movement (music) , variation (astronomy) , computer science , philosophy , physics , astrophysics , optics , aesthetics
This paper explores question formation in Kitharaka (E54; Bantu; Kenyan) within the crosslinguistic approach developed in Sabel (2000, 2002, 2003). According to Sabel, variation in the positioning of wh-phrases in languages can be explained if it is assumed that wh-movement is universally triggered by [+wh] and [+focus] features, both of which are [+interpretable] and can be specified as [±strong]. For Kitharaka, I argue that wh-movement is triggered by a strong [+focus] feature in a functional head (Foc). The strong [+focus] feature on a focus head is morphologically manifested by a focus marker which attaches to a fronted wh-phrase, and in case of long wh-movement, by the focus markers that may appear on embedded clauses crossed by overt wh-movement. Wh-in situ occurs when no strong [+focus] features are introduced in the syntax (Muriungi 2003,2004).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here