
A General Framework for Domain-Specialization of Stance Detection
Author(s) -
Brodie Mather,
Bonnie J. Dorr,
Owen Rambow,
Tomek Strzalkowski
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
proceedings of the ... international florida artificial intelligence research society conference
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2334-0762
pISSN - 2334-0754
DOI - 10.32473/flairs.v34i1.128457
Subject(s) - proposition , argument (complex analysis) , predicate (mathematical logic) , verb , computer science , context (archaeology) , artificial intelligence , domain (mathematical analysis) , mathematics , psychology , natural language processing , epistemology , philosophy , medicine , mathematical analysis , programming language , paleontology , biology
We present a generalized framework for domain-specialized stance detection, focusing on Covid-19 as a use case. We define a stance as a predicate-argument structure (combination of an action and its participants) in a simplified one-argument format, e.g., wear(a mask), coupled with a task-specific belief category representing the purpose (e.g., protection) of an argument (e.g., mask) in the context of its predicate (e.g., wear), as constrained by the domain (e.g., Covid-19). A belief category PROTECT captures a belief such as “masks provide protection,” whereas RESTRICT captures a belief such as “mask mandates limit freedom.” A stance combines a belief proposition, e.g., PROTECT(wear(a mask)), with a sentiment toward this proposition. From this, an overall positive attitude toward mask wearing is extracted. The notions purpose and function serve as natural constraints on the choice of belief categories during resource building which, in turn, constrains stance detection. We demonstrate that linguistic constraints (e.g., light verb processing) further refine the choice of predicate-argument pairings for belief and sentiment assignments, yielding significant increases in F1 score for stance detection over a strong baseline.