Open AccessResults of an Experimental Test of the Establishment of Readiness of Future Officers-Psychologists to Serve in the Armed Forces of Ukraine
Author(s) -
Anatolii Yurkov
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
intellectual archive
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1929-4700
DOI - 10.32370/ia_2021_06_16
Subject(s) - test (biology) , military personnel , military service , psychology , work (physics) , control (management) , applied psychology , service (business) , medical education , aeronautics , engineering , political science , management , law , medicine , mechanical engineering , paleontology , economics , biology , economy
The main tasks of the experimental work were: checking the pedagogical conditions identified on the basis of theoretical analysis of the establishment of readiness of future military psychologists for professional activity in the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the process of professional training; determining the dynamics of the establishment of readiness of future officers-psychologists for military service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the basis of developed criteria and indicators; performing statistical verification and confirming the results of experimental work; analyzing the results obtained and drawing conclusions and recommendations based on the results of the conducted pedagogical research.The study was conducted on the basis of the Military Institute of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, the Military Academy (Odessa) and the Department of military training of the National Aviation University. Three/four-year cadets, attendees on the training of reserve officers, educators and officers were involved in the experimental work. The given analysis of the components of readiness of future officers-psychologists of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for military service, namely: knowledge of theoretical material, motivation, emotional stability, endurance and communicative component have the root-mean-square results at the end of the experiment the analysis shows an increase in indicators by 10% in experimental groups relative to the control with the same indicators at the beginning of the experiment 58.5%. The qualitative indicator in the control group increased by 13.5%, and in the experimental group by 23.5%.