z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Using NIPAM gel dosimeter and concentric swing machine to simulate the dose distribu- tion during breathing: A feasibility study
Author(s) -
Jung-Chang Sun,
BorTsung Hsieh,
Chih-Wu Cheng,
Chih-Ming Hsieh,
YukWah Tsang,
Kai Yuan Cheng
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
technology and health care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.281
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1878-7401
pISSN - 0928-7329
DOI - 10.3233/thc-228012
Subject(s) - dosimeter , concentric , swing , dosimetry , radiation therapy , nuclear medicine , breathing , radiation treatment planning , computer science , simulation , biomedical engineering , materials science , medicine , mathematics , physics , surgery , acoustics , geometry , anatomy
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy plays an important role in cancer treatment today. Successful radiotherapy includes precise positioning and accurate dosimetry. OBJECTIVE: To use NIPAM gel dosimeter and concentric swing machine to simulate and evaluate the feasibility of lung or upper abdominal tumor dose distribution during breathing. METHODS: We used a concentric swing machine to simulate actual radiotherapy for lung or upper abdomen tumors. A 4 × 4 cm2 irradiation field area was set and MRI was performed. Next, readout analysis was performed using MATLAB and the 3 mm, 3% gamma passing rate > 95% was used as a basis for evaluation. RESULTS: The concentric dynamic dose curve for a simulated respiratory rate of 3 seconds/breath and 4 × 4 cm2 field was compared with 4 × 4, 3 × 3, and 2 × 2 cm2 treatment planning systems (TPS), and the 3 mm, 3% gamma passing rate was 42.87%, 54.96%, and 49.92%, respectively. Pre-simulation showed that the high-dose region dose curve was similar to the 2 × 2 cm2 TPS result. After appropriate selection and comparison, we found that the 3 mm, 3% gamma passing rate was 97.92% on comparing the > 60% dose curve with the 2 × 2 cm2 TPS. CONCLUSIONS: NIPAM gel dosimeter and concentric swing machine use is feasible to simulate dose distribution during breathing and results conforming to clinical evaluation standards.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here