
A tool for merging extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks
Author(s) -
Jérôme Delobelle,
Jean-Guy Mailly
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
argument and computation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.38
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1946-2166
pISSN - 1946-2174
DOI - 10.3233/aac-210014
Subject(s) - computer science , argumentation theory , programming language , scalability , java , constraint (computer aided design) , object oriented programming , modular design , representation (politics) , argumentation framework , theoretical computer science , software engineering , mathematics , database , philosophy , geometry , epistemology , politics , political science , law
We describe a tool that allows the merging of extensions of argumentation frameworks, following the approach defined by (In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’16) (2016) 33–42). The tool is implemented in Java, and is highly modular thanks to Object Oriented Programming (OOP) principles. We describe a short experimental study that assesses the scalability of the approach, as well as the impact on runtime of using an integrity constraint.