
The truth of the prophecy and miracles in the religion philosophy
Author(s) -
Leena Muthanna Adnan,
Ehsan Ali Abdul Amir
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
al-ādāb
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2706-9931
pISSN - 1994-473X
DOI - 10.31973/aj.v1i126.66
Subject(s) - revelation , philosophy , nothing , epistemology , vision , literature , theology , art
In this research, we have attempted to shed light on one of the main topics dealt with by the philosophy of religion, revelation, prophecy and miracles. I will focus on this research on the most important aspects of the study of contemporary Arab writers: Adib Saab, Sawdust. The central question we will ask is: Is revelation possible? Is prophecy translated and miracles? What is the validity of revelation and prophethood miracles? Are miracles only for prophets? Or else? We find that the writer is difficult to prove the issue of revelation through the statement of the quality of the divine discourse directed to humans from the tongue of God, and on the issue of miracles in the opinion of Adib Saab that miracles (wonders) is only the natural law itself. Al-Khasht agrees with the view that revelation and prophecy can be obtained. There is no logical impossibility in addressing God to His creatures, and if the quality of the speech directed by God differed to His creatures, either in the matter of miracles he goes on to say that miracles are not a creation of natural law, Which is familiar with nature, and while we find Nashar goes to support the issue of revelation, but warns of the need to distinguish between revelation in monotheistic religions and visions of the ruling. As for the issue of miracles, the narration is either a reason to prove the prophecy of a prophet or to prove a wisdom. Miracles are nothing but God's act in nature, and if we do not understand it now we may understand it tomorrow