Open AccessNarratives of Ambivalence
Author(s) -
Alexandra Ricard-Guay,
Myriam Denov
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
girlhood studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.296
H-Index - 6
eISSN - 1938-8322
pISSN - 1938-8209
DOI - 10.3167/ghs.2016.090305
Subject(s) - ambivalence , narrative , agency (philosophy) , nexus (standard) , context (archaeology) , power (physics) , dilemma , sociology , inclusion (mineral) , gender studies , qualitative research , psychology , social psychology , developmental psychology , epistemology , social science , history , linguistics , philosophy , physics , quantum mechanics , computer science , embedded system , archaeology
Published (Print):01 Dec 2016In this article, we examine the ethical realities that emerged from a qualitative study with adolescent girls on sexual exploitation. We outline and articulate the importance of moving beyond the inclusion of girls’ voices in research to discussing the ethical and practical implications of doing so. We consider the notions of power, victimization, and agency and highlight the ethical dilemma of doing research with girls in the sex trade, particularly in a context in which participants’ narratives are characterized by profound ambivalence, as seen in their frequent oscillation between narratives of victimization on the one hand, and of agency and power on the other. The nexus between girlhood studies and ethics provides us with a valuable opportunity to analyze, and thus highlight, the importance of social context in understanding these adolescent girls’ narratives and self-representations