Premium
When Tokens Matter
Author(s) -
CROWLEY JOCELYN ELISE
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
legislative studies quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.728
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1939-9162
pISSN - 0362-9805
DOI - 10.3162/036298004x201113
Subject(s) - legislature , test (biology) , differential (mechanical device) , backlash , state (computer science) , process (computing) , politics , public policy , ordered probit , computer science , political science , econometrics , economics , artificial intelligence , law , algorithm , paleontology , engineering , biology , aerospace engineering , operating system
Tokens, or low levels of minority or female representatives in state legislatures, have been studied with respect to their perceptions of self‐efficacy and political attitudes but not with respect to their actual influence on the passage of public policy. This paper uses state‐level data from the child support program between the years 1976–84 to measure the influence of women tokens on the policy process. Using ordered probit models, I explore policy adoption under three configurations: (1) a test of the independent impact of tokens, (2) a dynamic test of the differential impact of tokens and nontokens to analyze potential backlash effects and the potential diffusion of policy preferences, and (3) an interactive test on the potential for tokens to form coalitions. My analysis strongly suggests that tokens make a policy difference independently and to a greater extent than when they are on the cusp of becoming nontokens, but I found less support for the idea that tokens successfully form coalitions to achieve specific policy goals.