Open AccessIS IT WORTH READING K. MARX AND HOW TO READ IT?
Author(s) -
Viktor Ivanovich Kulik,
Ivan Viktorovich Kulik
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
nacionalʹnaâ associaciâ učënyh/nacionalʹnaâ associaciâ učenyh
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2782-2869
pISSN - 2413-5291
DOI - 10.31618/nas.2413-5291.2021.1.70.467
Subject(s) - appropriation , humanity , capital (architecture) , ideology , rate of profit , surplus value , reading (process) , sociology , meaning (existential) , neoclassical economics , relation (database) , profit (economics) , economics , capitalism , philosophy , law , epistemology , political science , history , politics , archaeology , database , computer science
On the Internet respectable economists are debating on the topic "False theses of Marxism: the tendency of the rate of profit to fall". Dozens of economists are involved in these debates. Some believe that K. Marx is right, others believe that he is wrong. At the same time, the disputants reveal negligence in relation to each other, a complete misunderstanding of the text of "CAPITAL", but they also admit accusations against K. Marx, such as: "his understanding of the meaning of the concept of" constant capital "was amateurish", or "the mechanism of "surplus time" was invented and the appropriation of workers' labor in this mythical "surplus time", and so on, etc. We cannot agree with such an attitude towards K. Marx, who left us (humanity!) An invaluable ideological legacy, manuscripts not fully published during his lifetime under the general title "CAPITAL".