Open AccessA Experimental Study of Laboratory Compaction and Sand Cone on Foundation Tub Soil
Author(s) -
Meti,
Tri Harianto,
A. R. Djamaluddin,
Achmad Bakri Muhiddin
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
science proceedings series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2663-9467
pISSN - 2663-9459
DOI - 10.31580/sps.v3i1.1953
Subject(s) - compaction , proctor compaction test , geotechnical engineering , foundation (evidence) , soil compaction , water content , sieve (category theory) , bearing capacity , sieve analysis , soil test , laboratory test , soil gradation , environmental science , soil water , engineering , soil science , mathematics , geography , archaeology , combinatorics , biochemical engineering
Soil is a very important material so that it must be able to support the loads above it, so the soil must have a sufficiently good soil bearing capacity. In this study, the soil compaction was compared with the laboratory compaction method with the sandcone method. The objectives of the study were knowing the characteristics of the soil and knowing the laboratory compaction compares with the sandcone compaction in the foundation tub. Soil is drawn from the same point for the Proctor Test and Sand cone Test. The results of this test are used in the foundation model test. Characteristics testing in the laboratory: moisture content, density, consistency limits (LL, PL), sieve analysis, hydrometer, laboratory compaction and sandcone. Research result It was found that the soil type was based on the AASHTO classification was A-7-5 and the soil classification based on the Unifield Soil Classification System (USCS) was MH. Laboratory compaction (Proctor Test) average moisture content of 32.26%, γd maximum 1.33 g/cm³, and the sandcone compaction of model foundation test of soil without foundation ɣd was 1.36 g/cm³ , Vertically arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³ , horizontally arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³