English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

T e professionalization of evaluation means dif erent things to dif erent people, and as a result, the f eld lacks a clear understanding of how to empirically assess evaluator professionalism. T is exploratory study used a sociological model to study the behaviours of practicing evaluators in Canada and the United States using f ve concepts: expertise, ethical disposition, professional autonomy, innovation and research, and credentialing. Results from 27 in-depth interviews and a survey of 456 respondents demonstrated that, depending on their demographic characteristics, perceptions of professionalism dif ered between evaluators in the two countries. T e study determined that theory-based sociological models can provide insights into the professionalization of program evaluation.

Professionalism in Program Evaluators: A Comparison of American and Canadian Evaluators