Open AccessStatus of Medical Devices and their Utilization in 9 Tertiary Hospitals and 5 Research institutions in Uganda
Author(s) -
Robert Ssekitoleko,
Beryl Ngabirano,
Solomon Oshabahebwa,
Lucy Kevin Namuli,
Julius Mugaga,
Catherine Namayega,
Emmanuel Einyat Opolot,
Jackline Winfred Baluka,
Charles Ibingira,
Ian G. Munabi,
Moses Joloba
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
global clinical engineering journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2578-2762
DOI - 10.31354/globalce.v4i3.127
Subject(s) - medical equipment , sophistication , health care , business , baseline (sea) , health facility , medical emergency , medicine , environmental health , operations management , engineering , health services , economic growth , nursing , political science , social science , population , sociology , law , economics
Backgrounds and Objective: Advancements in technology have led to great strides in research and innovation that have improved healthcare provision around the world. However, the majority of the technology available is underutilized in Sub-Saharan Africa. In addition, the ever-increasing sophistication and cost of medical equipment means that access and proper use is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is, however, a general paucity of well-documented evidence for the utilization of medical equipment in LMICs. Therefore, this study evaluates the current availability and utilization of medical equipment in tertiary hospitals and research facilities in Uganda and provides baseline information to clinical/biomedical engineers, innovators, managers, and policymakers.Material and Methods: The study evaluated the equipment currently used in 9 purposively selected public tertiary hospitals and 5 research laboratories representing different regions of Uganda. Data were collected by personnel specialized in biomedical engineering utilizing a mixed-method approach that involved inventory taking and surveys directed to the health workers in the designated health facilities. Results: The hospitals contributed 1995 (85%) pieces of medical equipment while the research laboratories contributed 343 (15%) pieces amounting to 2338 pieces of equipment involved in the study. On average, 34% of the medical equipment in the health facilities was faulty, and 85.6% lacked manuals.Discussion and conclusion: Although innovative solutions and donated equipment address the immediate and long-term goals of resource-constrained settings, our study demonstrated several issues around existing medical devices, and these need immediate attention.