z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Penerapan Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Berdasarkan Undang-undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Author(s) -
Rahmayanti Rahmayanti,
Muhammad Arif Maulana,
Stanley Alvin,
Nadya Elvara Lili Paly
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jurnal mercatoria
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2541-5913
pISSN - 1979-8652
DOI - 10.31289/mercatoria.v13i1.3140
Subject(s) - law , political science , burden of proof , public prosecutor , language change , criminal law , philosophy , linguistics
The eradication of corruption was carried out in many ways, one of which with a reverse proof system which was established with the act of eradication of corruption crimes. The upside-down reproof is an aberration of evidence in the act of events. In order not to happen dualism rules in reverse proof it must have a clear criminal law rules in the use of the reversed evidence formulation. From all the explanations about this reverse proof law, as for the reverse-proof law, using the purely reverse-proof law and reason behind the limited changes in the criminal act Corruption, the upside-down proof only in the application of the trial of the judge never to provide the origin of the property but based on the evidence given by the public prosecutor.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here