
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Penerapan Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Berdasarkan Undang-undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Author(s) -
Rahmayanti Rahmayanti,
Muhammad Arif Maulana,
Stanley Alvin,
Nadya Elvara Lili Paly
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jurnal mercatoria
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2541-5913
pISSN - 1979-8652
DOI - 10.31289/mercatoria.v13i1.3140
Subject(s) - law , political science , burden of proof , public prosecutor , language change , criminal law , philosophy , linguistics
The eradication of corruption was carried out in many ways, one of which with a reverse proof system which was established with the act of eradication of corruption crimes. The upside-down reproof is an aberration of evidence in the act of events. In order not to happen dualism rules in reverse proof it must have a clear criminal law rules in the use of the reversed evidence formulation. From all the explanations about this reverse proof law, as for the reverse-proof law, using the purely reverse-proof law and reason behind the limited changes in the criminal act Corruption, the upside-down proof only in the application of the trial of the judge never to provide the origin of the property but based on the evidence given by the public prosecutor.