z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Menyelesaikan Kasus Tanah tentang Hak Pengelolaan
Author(s) -
Rafiqi Rafiqi
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
jppuma: jurnal ilmu pemerintahan dan sosial politik uma (journal of governance and political social uma)/jppuma (jurnal ilmu pemerintahan dan sosial politik uma) (journal of governance and political social uma)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2550-1305
pISSN - 2549-1660
DOI - 10.31289/jppuma.v5i2.1207
Subject(s) - principle of legality , law , certificate , political science , state (computer science) , legal certainty , business , computer science , algorithm
The Law of Execution in the Administrative Court is different from the law of execution in civil courts. The civil trial of execution law is supplemented by physical means, namely: Jita Sita, aid of State Instruments (Police) and so on, which can force fiction so that the losers obey the court's decision. In the Administrative Court it is not possible, the Administrative Court is only equipped with administrative facilities only, in accordance with its authority which only judges in terms of administrative legality (administrative court). Rights Management issued a letter of proof of rights in the form of a certificate of Right of Management by the Land Office. The management rights are the right to land. The purpose of legal certainty itself will be fulfilled if if a device or legal system that can run and support the achievement of a legal kepolisia, especially the role of institutions that are authorized

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here