
Impact of Censorship on the ‘Historical’ Video-Game
Author(s) -
James Andrew John Piggott
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
reinvention
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1755-7429
DOI - 10.31273/reinvention.v12i2.360
Subject(s) - censorship , narrative , video game , historiography , frame (networking) , video game culture , cosmic censorship hypothesis , computer science , media studies , multimedia , sociology , game mechanics , law , turns, rounds and time keeping systems in games , political science , video game design , literature , art , telecommunications , mathematical analysis , mathematics , gravitational singularity
This article presents two related ideas. Firstly, video-games should be considered a historically relevant medium through their capacity to generate narratives and lessons of the past. Secondly, the issue of censorship – the doctoring of the past when creating said narratives – is as equally detrimental to history as shown within video-games as it is in alternative formats. The historical significance of censorship within video-games, however, has been largely ignored, mainly due to the perceived ‘trivial’ or ‘ludified’ nature of the medium. As a result, the historiographical capacity of video-games continues to be trivialised and undermined. These arguments are covered over three sections. The first unpacks several criticisms of video-games, in turn showing the medium’s historical capacity. The second uses the example of Nazism to describe and explain the presence of censorship within video-games and the rationale that informs it. The final section links these two ideas, discussing the historical impact of censorship within video-games and why the ‘ludic frame’ of video-games seemingly shadows their equally significant ‘historical frame’.