Open AccessGranice ingerencji w prawo do prywatności w procesie zwalczania przestępczości oraz zapobiegania jej skutkom
Author(s) -
Erwin Ryter,
Justyna Ryter
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
problemy prawa karnego
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2353-9712
pISSN - 0208-5577
DOI - 10.31261/ppk.2021.05.02.07
Subject(s) - suspect , eavesdropping , context (archaeology) , internet privacy , right to privacy , psychology , relation (database) , political science , criminology , computer security , law and economics , social psychology , sociology , computer science , paleontology , biology , database
In their article, Erwin Ryter and Justyna Ryter make an attempt to answer the following questions: What may be the farthest limit of tolerance towards public authorities’ interference with a person’s right to privacy in the context of fight against crime as well as the performance of necessary and purposeful procedural actions? Can both the procedural objective and the fact of the violation of the right to privacy of the suspect justify direct or indirect interference with the privacy of persons from the suspect’s social environment, even if that interference is a side effect of actions taken against the offender? The authors of this article also raise the issue of privacy violations in relation to various forms of monitoring of persons who are of interest to the authorities conducting the proceedings. In particular, these proceedings may involve keeping various types of registers containing the data of offender, using classified eavesdropping on them, observing their whereabouts, and disclosing their personal data.