z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Under graduate student feedback on teaching and evaluation method in clinical pharmacology
Author(s) -
SK Deo
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of college of medical sciences-nepal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2091-0673
pISSN - 2091-0657
DOI - 10.3126/jcmsn.v9i3.10220
Subject(s) - medical education , teaching method , mathematics education , graduate students , preference , subject (documents) , computer science , psychology , medicine , mathematics , statistics , library science
Background Any teaching and evaluation method can be considered as effective once they are judged by students.Objective This study was designed to obtain feedback on teaching and evaluation methods in the subject of clinical pharmacology among under graduate studentsMethods Feedback on teaching and evaluation method was taken from undergraduate students of 2009 batch and various approaches to teaching and evaluation are identified. To know the effect of these novel approaches of teaching and evaluation, student feedback was taken from subsequent batch 2010 and 2011 using a written validated questionnaire covering various aspects of teaching and evaluation methods.Results Under graduate students were satisfied with all teaching methods like lecture and pharmacological exercises. They showed preference for tutorials, short answer questions and revision classes where as they were not satisfied with seminar method of learning. All students felt that there should be more time for clinical pharmacology and pharmacological problem based exercises.. The pass percentage of the subsequent batch in university examinations improved from 75 % to 90%.Conclusion Based upon the student’s feedback, incorporation of suggestion obtained from the students resulted in improvement in performance of the students. Hence, it is very essential to take regular feedback from the students to synchronize teaching and evaluation method of the students.Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal, 2013, Vol-9, No-3, 31-34

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here