Open AccessANALISIS SOAL UAS GASAL 2017/2018 PKN KELAS VI SD DI UPTD PENDIDIKAN GENUK SEMARANG
Author(s) -
Muhamad Afandi,
Itsna Iin Nazilah
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
tunjuk ajar/tunjuk ajar
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2622-3554
pISSN - 2615-062X
DOI - 10.31258/jta.v1i2.103-115
Subject(s) - reliability (semiconductor) , psychology , class (philosophy) , quality (philosophy) , meaning (existential) , mathematics education , measure (data warehouse) , validity , power (physics) , social psychology , mathematics , computer science , psychometrics , artificial intelligence , developmental psychology , philosophy , physics , epistemology , quantum mechanics , psychotherapist , database
The purpose of this research is to find out the quality of the exam questions of UAS Gasal 2017-2018 PKn Class VI Elementary School in the Genuk Semarang Education UPTD based on, among others: validity, reliability, level of difficulty, distinguishing power, and deceptive analysis. The results of the study are valid (76%) and invalid (24%) means that the odd UAS given to students can measure the ability of students, reliability there are numbers 1 to 50 coefficients of 0.48 which are criteria enough to mean the odd UAS questions given to participant students can measure the ability of students, difficulties are (54%) criteria are being and (28%) easy criteria means that the problem of odd UAS cannot distinguish the ability of students with high and low ability as well as measuring the ability of students, the distinguishing ability is (52%) the criteria are enough that the odd UAS questions given to students can measure students' abilities, and there are (98%) misleading analysis which is not good, meaning that the repetition of the exam on the odd semester is not good enough. the criteria that have been obtained data processing of students' learning outcomes can be known criteria of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, distinguishing power, and deception analysis.