Open AccessAlmost Risking It All
Author(s) -
Bodil Christensen,
Peter Vistisen,
Thessa Jensen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
cubic journal/cubic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2589-7101
pISSN - 2589-7098
DOI - 10.31182/cubic.2021.4.035
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , german , space (punctuation) , engineering ethics , epistemology , sociology , risk society , element (criminal law) , design elements and principles , engineering , computer science , social science , political science , law , systems engineering , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , linguistics , operating system
This paper provides an argument against understanding risk-taking in design education as something ideally in need of only being calculable and formalisable. Using the German sociologist Ulrich Beck’s theory on risktaking combined with the current discourse on design thinking, together with an analysis of a three week-long interdisciplinary design workshop, we analyse and discuss how risk-taking - as a general concept - in design education is an inherent element of the education itself. We argue, however, non-calculable risks, like human-centred design concerns, like desirability of use, ethics of technology, are an equally important part of a modern-day educational skillset as calculable risks. The aim is arguing for the prospect of interdisciplinary design-based education models as one way of embracing the non-calculable elements of a problem space.