z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
On the Problem of the Czech-German Opposition in the Hussite Wars
Author(s) -
Nikolay N. Naumov,
AUTHOR_ID
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
slavânskij mir v tretʹem tysâčeletii
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2782-442X
pISSN - 2412-6446
DOI - 10.31168/2412-6446.2021.16.3-4.01
Subject(s) - german , peasant , opposition (politics) , nobility , nationalism , politics , czech , history , ancient history , xenophobia , emperor , political science , economic history , law , philosophy , archaeology , linguistics
Since the time of the historico-political polemics between František Palacký and Constantin von Höfler in the middle of nineteenth century, the term “national” has been used by Czech historians to identify the character of the Hussite wars. The execution of Jan Hus in Constance as well as the proclamations of the crusades against the Hussites in Bohemia are defined as “an insult to national honor” (František Palacký), and they produced the Taborite movement as “a national peasant war of the Czech under the flag of religion against the German nobility and the supremacy of the German Emperor” (Friedrich Engels / Josef Macek), while the military invasion released a “national” which spread among the whole society (František Šmahel). To what extent does the term “nationalism of defense” and its derivates befit the study of the contradictions that existed between the Czechs and the Germans in the Bohemian kingdom of that period? This paper proves that the Prague Hussites did not consider the Bohemian Germans their “natural foes” but did so of the crusaders who came from the German lands along with King Sigismund. The author argues that the Prague Hussites had not a cultural, but a political xenophobia focused on the foreign German invaders.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here