Difficulties of multidisciplinary diagnostics of indeterminate colitis

Aim of the study: Using the example of a clinical case, to show the importance of dynamic observation by means of various diagnostic methods of intestinal imaging, in combination with a pathomorphological confirmation method for setting the correct clinical diagnosis. Materials and methods: The studies were performed on multislice computed tomographs Brilliance CT and ICT (Philips Medical Systems) and magnetic resonance imaging machines (GE), with intravenous contrast enhancement. We used special methods of contrasting the lumen of the intestine with gradual and retrograde filling it with water. The surgical material fixed in 10% neutral formuline for 10-24 hours. Tissue fragments were processed in a Leica TP1020 histoprocessor (Leica BioSystems, Germany) according to a standard protocol, after which it was embedded in paraffin blocks. Histological sections with a thickness of 3-5 μm were made by a Leica RM2245 microtome (Leica BioSystems, Germany). The prepared histological preparations were stained with hematoxylin and eosin in a Leica Autosteiner XL histostiner (Leica BioSystems, Germany). Results: From 2013 to 2020 patient K. underwent 4 colonoscopies, 5 esophagogastroduodenoscopies, 1 Х-ray examination with small bowel series, 3 MRI studies and 5 CT studies, including those with intravenous contrast enhancement, with a total radiation exposure of 187 mSv. The diagnosis was revised from ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease to NC. The final diagnosis was made by the pathologist’s analysis of materials. Conclusion: The clinical case presented by us clearly demonstrates the importance of dynamic observation by computed and magnetic resonance imaging, in combination with a pathomorphological confirmation method.