
Public Expenditure in Regions: Current State and Problems (Exemplified by Registries of Expenditure Commitments of the Regions in the Russian Far East)
Author(s) -
E. B. Veprikova,
AUTHOR_ID,
Aleksei Novitskii,
AUTHOR_ID
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
finansovyj žurnal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2658-5332
pISSN - 2075-1990
DOI - 10.31107/2075-1990-2021-6-117-131
Subject(s) - government (linguistics) , business , state (computer science) , flexibility (engineering) , autonomy , central government , public expenditure , public finance , economic policy , local government , public economics , economic growth , economics , political science , public administration , philosophy , linguistics , management , algorithm , computer science , law , macroeconomics
Exemplified by regions of the Russian Far East, the article presents a view on the current state and problems of managing regional public expenditures, including the focus of public expenditure on regional development. The research is based on the data from expenditure commitments registries in 2019. A major share of budget expenditures is “compulsory” (pre-determined) expenditures, which have limited flexibility and cannot be redirected to different purposes. Under these circumstances, the ability of regional governments to vary the direction of budget spending and finance self-initiated expenditure commitments—in other words, to independently manage the composition of expenditures—is kept to a minimum, which implies low autonomy in managing expenditures. Most of the Russian Far Eastern regions’ government expenditures are aimed at supporting the current volume and quality of public services. The share of developmental expenditures is higher in regions having more budget resources (Sakhalin Oblast), and significantly lower in regions of the northern Far East (Magadan Oblast, Kamchatka Krai, and Sakha Republic (Yakutia)), the latter having higher costs of supporting critical infrastructure under severe climate conditions. In the present situation, regional governments cannot be fully considered as key influencers managing the development of their territories, and only fill the role of executors and lobbying actors for acquiring financial support from the federal government. As a result, it is difficult to account for specific territorial circumstances and development potential, and the overall efficiency of government spending is decreased. In the authors’ opinion, the findings may be applicable to most regions in the Russian Federation.