
Comparison Between Cytobrush® and Papaplast® in Sampling Vaginal Smears
Author(s) -
Hjersing Mats,
Holm Erik,
Larsson Goran
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.3109/00016349109007923
Subject(s) - medicine , gynecology , vaginal smear , obstetrics , estrous cycle
The ability of Cytobrush® and Papaplast® to collect endocervical cells in vaginal smears was tested in a prospective randomized comparative study including 107 women. Endocervical cells were found more often and in greater numbers with Cytobrush, also in women over 50 years of age. Papaplast missed endocervical cells twice as often as did Cytobrush. The use of the latter instrument meant that the number of repeat smears necessitated due to the absence of endocervical cells could be considerably reduced, with consequent improvement in the cost/benefit ratio.