z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Laparoscopic versus ultraminilaparotomic myomectomy for the treatment of large uterine myomas
Author(s) -
CIAVATTINI ANDREA,
TSIROGLOU DIMITRIOS,
TRANQUILLI ANDREA LUIGI,
LITTA PIETRO
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.3109/00016340903295592
Subject(s) - medicine , laparotomy , uterine myomectomy , myoma , surgery , laparoscopy , retrospective cohort study , leiomyoma , uterine rupture , task force , laparoscopic surgery , uterus , public administration , political science
We compared short‐term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and ultraminilaparotomic procedures for the treatment of large uterine myomas in a retrospective matched‐control study (Canadian Task Force classification II‐2) of 32 women with large myomas who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy and 32 women who had ultraminilaparotomic myomectomy (≤4 cm incision). Myomectomies were successfully performed for all women in both groups, but time to discharge was significantly lower after laparoscopic than after ultraminilaparotomic myomectomy (p = 0.01). Laparoscopic myomectomy seems to be the preferable approach for the treatment of large myomas of ≥5 cm, providing a more rapid recovery compared to the ultraminilaparotomic approach. Ultraminilaparotomy may be a valid alternative in case of laparoconversion instead of the classic laparotomy approach.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here