z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pseudo Judicial Review dalam Perkara Pemilukada
Author(s) -
Irfan Nur Rachman
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
jurnal konstitusi/jurnal konstitusi
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2548-1657
pISSN - 1829-7706
DOI - 10.31078/jk1219
Subject(s) - constitutional court , judicial review , law , political science , verdict , legislation , statute , context (archaeology) , judicial activism , history , constitution , archaeology
Judicial review is the test act against UUD 1945 that is one authority the constitutional court. In testing legislation affairs, the constitutional court could have cancel or material handling charge article / ayat / part of a statute.  But in the legal developments event at the constitutional court, turned in regional head affair how the constitutional court to review (pseudo judicial testing legislation specious) where the constitutional court to do our tests material charge / article ayat / or part of a statute. The research results show that on formil, judicial review the request in the matter of the act of testing and supplication pseudo judicial review in the matter of the results   of the upcoming general election strife is different because be set by two types of laws the event under the authority of the different. However, in the context of judicial review of the verdict, construction and construction of pseudo judicial review similarities and differences will be discussed in the article below.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here