z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Sovereign Defaults and Banking Crises
Author(s) -
Kanat Isakov
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
žurnal èkonomičeskoj teorii
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2073-6517
DOI - 10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-1.2
Subject(s) - default , sovereign default , bond , monetary economics , financial system , sovereignty , maturity (psychological) , european debt crisis , economics , credit risk , debt , business , sovereign debt , finance , international economics , european integration , european union , political science , politics , law
This research is aimed at contributing to the endogenization of default costs. Higher exposure of a banking system to sovereign bonds increases the likelihood of banking panics due to sovereign defaults. Following (Gertler, Kiyotaki, 2015), the research models the possibility of a banking crisis occurring after a sovereign default. While a higher exposure of a banking system is associated with potential losses, this mechanism creates a stronger commitment to honor the sovereign debt. A marginal increase in the sovereign debt raises the ex-post costs of default through a higher likelihood of a banking crisis, thus making a default option less desirable. This mechanism might increase investors’ confidence and resolve the coordination problem of self-fulfilling crises. In part, this may explain the findings of Bocola and Dovis (2019), who claim that non-fundamental risk played only a limited role during the European sovereign debt crisis. Furthermore, as opposed to the standard solution of the coordination problem — to issue debt of longer maturity — a government can resolve this problem by forcing its banking system to hold more sovereign bonds.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here