
Review as a procedure of expert evaluation of the quality of scientific articles
Author(s) -
Андрей Киричек,
Andrey Kirichek,
Анна Морозова,
Анна Морозова,
Валерий Спасенников,
Valeriy Spasennikov
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
èrgodizajn
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2658-4026
pISSN - 2619-1512
DOI - 10.30987/article_5bf98b622928e6.08038377
Subject(s) - unification , quality (philosophy) , management science , scientific article , process (computing) , scientific literature , computer science , engineering ethics , psychology , epistemology , political science , engineering , philosophy , law , publishing , paleontology , biology , programming language , operating system
The necessity of unification of the form of review in the process of decision-making on the publication of articles in scientific journals is explained. The experience of peer review of manuscripts in domestic scientific journals is summarized. The criteria for assessing the quality of scientific articles, a unified form of review-questionnaire, as well as examples of its application are proposed.