
Brisovna tužba
Author(s) -
Dinka Šago,
Zrinka Radić
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
zbornik pravnog fakulteta sveučilišta u rijeci/zbornik pravnog fakulteta sveučilišta u rijeci
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1846-8314
pISSN - 1330-349X
DOI - 10.30925/zpfsr.38.1.17
Subject(s) - croatian , humanities , mathematics , political science , philosophy , linguistics
The holder of a registrable right whichhas been infringed by the entry in favourof another person shall be authorised, in order to protect his right, torequest thecancellation of all entries that infringe his rights and the establishment ofthe formerland registry status (cancellation claim), as long as the facts on the basis ofwhichhis registrable right should terminate anyway become effective, unlessotherwisestipulated by law.Is it truly a registration (of other) of land rights in favor of a personestablishedor not, it is precisely the subject of a proceeding initiated by thecancellation suit. Thisquestion shall be competently responded by the court in litigation. In fact, ifit turnsout, contrary to the holder’s claim, that the registration of the second landright wasfounded, there shall be no provision of legal protection in the form ofcancellation ofthis second right. The rules on the registration of dispute shall apply to therecordationof a cancellation claim. The person who has requested the issuance of therecordationof a cancellation claim and has, without a justifi ed reason, failed to submitsuch claim,shall be responsible for the damage incurred to the person in whose favour theentryhas been made.