
Developing an ecological riskbased approach to manage phytosanitary pest risks on export Pinus radiata logs from New Zealand
Author(s) -
Stephen M. Pawson,
C. M. Romo,
Jeremy T. Kerr,
Martin K-F Bader,
Eckehard G. Brockerhoff
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
proceedings of the new zealand weed and pest control conference/new zealand plant protection/proceedings of the ... national weeds conference/proceedings of the new zealand weed control conference/proceedings of the new zealand plant protection conference
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 0370-2804
pISSN - 0370-0968
DOI - 10.30843/nzpp.2013.66.5704
Subject(s) - phytosanitary certification , biology , pest analysis , pinus radiata , fumigation , infestation , integrated pest management , phenology , ecology , agroforestry , agronomy , botany , horticulture
New Zealand currently exports 47 billion of wood products including more than 127 million m3 of logs (almost all Pinus radiata) Currently all logs are treated to eliminate infestation by phytosanitary pests with these treatments being specified by the import requirements of trading partners The most common treatment used at present is fumigation with methyl bromide or in the case of China phosphine which is permitted on the basis of an experimental use permit The primary pests of concern are two species of bark beetles (Hylurgus ligniperda and Hylastes ater) two species of wood borers (Arhopalus ferus and Prionoplus reticularis) and Sirex noctilio Sirex is rare in New Zealand due to the combination of a successful biological control programme and improved forest management practices However trading partners are sensitive to Sirex due to its impact in other countriesScion has just embarked on a 4year programme of research to evaluate the necessity of current mandatory end point phytosanitary treatments such as fumigation As an alternative we propose an ecologicallybased assessment process that determines actual phytosanitary risk so that the need for preexport treatments can be evaluated This concept uses ecological information eg pest phenology habitat requirements developmental biology and dispersal capabilities to determine if the potential pest pressure at a given time and place warrants the need for the application of an end point phytosanitary treatmentThis programme is adopting a Bayesian Network approach to model infestation risk both spatially and temporally The models rely heavily on (1) quantifying the thermal development of pest species so that phenology can be predicted from current and future meteorological conditions (2) understanding the influence of landscape context on pest abundance and (3) accurate estimates of pest dispersal abilities throughout the landscape The programme is supported by a national Quarantine Pest Trapping Network (QPTN) that will provide 4 years of pest abundance data from sites in both forests and ports The QPTN data will be used to make an initial case for a winter pestfree area of production contribute to the validation of the Bayesian Network models and provide the backbone of a future official assurance monitoring programme to support the adoption of an ecologicallybased assessment of phytosanitary risks to reduce the need for treatments of export logs