Open AccessEfektivitas Strategi Inquiry Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Mata Kuliah Sistem Informasi Perbankan
Author(s) -
Nurbaiti Nurbaiti
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
at-tawassuth : jurnal ekonomi islam
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2580-944X
pISSN - 2549-0230
DOI - 10.30821/ajei.v3i1.1705
Subject(s) - mathematics education , test (biology) , f test , brainstorming , normality test , homogeneous , statistics , statistical hypothesis testing , mathematics , psychology , computer science , artificial intelligence , paleontology , combinatorics , biology
This study aims to know the student learning outcomes by using brainstorming method, conventional methods and knowing the difference between both of the 2 learning methods in the course of banking information systems . The objects are the students of semester V of Islamic Economics Program about 62 students with random sampling. In this research, the researchers succeeded in obtaining the values for the normality test in the experimental class on the pre-test obtained Lstat = 0.122, while in the post-test Lstat= 0,093 and for the control class on the pre-test Lstat = 0.129, while in the post-test 0.102, then the Ltabel = 0.159 with the two classes having the same number of students, means the data is normally distributed. For homogeneity test the value of pre-test obtained Fstat = 1.61 and the value of post-test diperleh Fhitung = 1.17, while for Ftabel = 1.84, which means the two samples each homogeneous. As for the hypothesis test t obtained price t count = 2.389 and ttable = 2,000. Which means t-stat > t-table, that is 2,389 > 2,000 means there are differences in learning outcomes in banking information system courses that are taught by brainstorming and conventional methods.