Open AccessThe Problem of Subclass Features in Forensic Firearms Identification
Author(s) -
Pavel Giverts,
А. В. Кокин
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
teoriâ i praktika sudebnoj èkspertizy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2587-7275
pISSN - 1819-2785
DOI - 10.30764/1819-2785-2020-1-109-117
Subject(s) - subclass , identification (biology) , class (philosophy) , forensic science , computer science , type (biology) , cartridge , position (finance) , forensic identification , artificial intelligence , genealogy , criminology , computer security , psychology , history , archaeology , medicine , geology , biology , business , paleontology , botany , finance , antibody , immunology
The Russian school of forensic firearms investigation traditionally recognizes common and individual features of traces on bullets and cartridge cases. The first are characteristics inherent in all weapons of the same model and describing their details in general: shape, size, location, relative position. The second type are individual characteristics, which are unique and present only in one firearm. The individual features are used for forensic identification, while the common can be used only for the identification of a firearm’s type and model. The Western (West Europe and the USA) methodology of forensic ballistic identification recognizes the third type of traits – subclass characteristics. These marks are the result of manufacturing processes and can be present in a group of sequentially produced parts. Conventionally they can be placed between class and individual characteristics. One of the problems in contemporary firearms identification is the wrong recognition of subclass marks as individual marks and, as a result, giving false-positive conclusions of identification. The article discusses the problem of subclass features, gives examples, presents a review of the literature. The influence of various technological processes on the possibility of showing up of these marks is described.