z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Development of Religious and Philosophical Anthropological Paradigm in Soviet Philosophy in 1985–1991: A Historical and Philosophical Analysis
Author(s) -
Oleg A. Ustinov
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
filosofskie nauki
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2618-8961
pISSN - 0235-1188
DOI - 10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-8-126-142
Subject(s) - philosophical anthropology , materialism , constructive , epistemology , philosophical methodology , soul , religious philosophy , philosophical theory , sociology , meaning (existential) , philosophical analysis , object (grammar) , western philosophy , philosophy , social science , linguistics , process (computing) , computer science , operating system
The article considers the religious-philosophical anthropological paradigm in Soviet philosophy during the years of perestroika. It was during this period that Soviet idealist philosophers, forced to work under the conditions of a “scientific underground” for seven decades, first gained the right to participate legally in academic discussions. They substantiated the idea of man as a divine immortal being called to deification, restored, and approved in the official discourse the religious-philosophical anthropological model, either reinterpreting it according to the samples of Byzantine patristics, or synthesizing it with oriental beliefs. The article reconstructs and analyzes the basic provisions of this paradigm: ideas about the origin of man, the relationship of soul and body, free will, the meaning and purpose of life, the relationship between the individual and society. It is concluded that the development of late Soviet religious and philosophical anthropological thought was determined by the tendency to self-isolation, associated with the actual refusal of its supporters from a constructive dialogue with adherents of materialistic teachings, and, consequently, the refusal to develop a synthesized concept of man. Adherents of the religious-philosophical approach expressed the hope that Christian anthropology would be taken as the basis for all philosophical developments of the future. However, contrary to their plans, this paradigm did not acquire a dominant position in modern Russian philosophy, and remained an object of interest for historians of philosophy and not for experts in philosophical anthropology and social philosophy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here